- Image via Wikipedia
The versions of Knowledge management go hand in hand with the versions of the internet : 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, …
But how far are we with knowledge management?
In an interesting presentation, David Gurteen gives the most important characteristics of Knowledge Management 1.0 and 2.0. In the table I summarise the highlights of it.
Knowledge management 1.0 | Knowledge management 2.0 |
techno-centric | people-centric |
command and control | social |
centralised monolithic systems | decentralised ecosystems |
email, newsletters, databases | social tools (blogs, wikis, IM‘s) |
KM is extra work | KM is part of my work |
IT selects the tools | I select my tools |
These are the same differences between web 1.0 and the social web.
But what about the semantic web ? Is there also a Semantic Knowledge Management ? (or KM 3.0 ?)
I assume there not one yet. But is there one to come ? In any case The 1st Workshop on Knowledge Management with Web 3.0 has yet to be hold.
In an article on IEEE Distributed Systems Online about Semantic-Web-Based Knowledge Management John Davies, Miltiadis Lytras and Amit P. Sheth summarise their view on the topic. The most pertinent topics are :
- metadata management and extraction of attribute values for improved search
- integration of knowledge creation and use, integration of technical and human intelligence
- using semantic web technologies to exploit information sources like wikipedia
But this all has still a long way to go.
[…] is a simple overview of the differences between KM 1.0 and KM 2.0 by Mixotrichabased on a presentation by David Gurteen. I have added KM […]
By: Apply Knowledge Management 3.0: This time it’s personal « Fredzimny's Blog on February 7, 2010
at 3:29 pm